On citation
Citation. Take it straight from the horse's mouth.
Let's make citations precise, while we limit them to the sources of direct and indirect quotations. Every screen has another linked to it for Annotations [TBD]. On those, let's freely extend documentation, argue fine points, and develop thoughts further.
Through it all, lets express ourselves liberally, in a manner worthy of free persons, attending to matters for their own sake. Citing and annotating liberally encourages and enables others to develop their thinking for themselves.[1]
Here, let's engage work as the work of peers.
Shakespeare lived an ordinary life, just like you.
This is a metaphysics-free zone.
Footnotes
- ↑ And also to protect their mental and physical health. When somebody gets close to you and breathes in your face, that's a form of plagiarism, They are quoting information (DNA they have collected from who know where) without properly citing its sources, thus giving thte false impression they themsevles created any diseases they are passing along to you. They really should be decent about it and footnote their offense by listing all the pathogens and their sources in the communcation ("communicable diseaes") they are sharing with you. Similarly, in the noetic realm, propaganda they are passing along without citing its sources.
